Fedrick Herzberg’s
Two Factor Theory
By the influence of Maslow’s
hierarchy of needs, Fredrick Herzberg published the two factor model of work
motivation and developed the motivation-hygiene theory in 1959. Herzberg
introduced two models of factors which are influencing people’s attitude
towards work (Alshmemri,
Shahwan and Maude, 2017).
Herzberg revealed certain characteristics are constantly related with
regards to job satisfaction while others are related with job dissatisfaction.
The two factors which have been classified are motivator factors and hygiene
factors from the basis of Motivational- Hygiene Model (Baah,
2011).
This model states
when employee motivation is achieved, employee effects will be recognized and
it brings job satisfaction and motivation. It happens when employees are faced
with challenges but enjoy the job with where one can achieve, grow and show
responsibility towards organization (Baah and Kofi Amoako, 2011). Motivation factors lead positively to do the job while
hygiene factors are surrounded by the ‘doing’ of job (Stello, 2011). Two
factor theory is the difference between motivation and hygiene factors or in
another words the difference between intrinsic and extrinsic factors. Herzberg et al, (1959) states
motivation factors as intrinsic to the job and hygiene factors as extrinsic to
the job. So Motivation factors use only to increase and improve job satisfaction
where hygiene factors use to reduce job dissatisfaction.
Motivator
Factors
The
definition of Motivation is ‘how to provide something’
(Ruthankoon
& Ogunlana, 2003). Job satisfaction is mostly correlated with
motivation (Alshmemri, Shahwan and Maude, 2017).
These factors pertain to the job and
they are intrinsic to the job. It contains physiological need for growth and
recognition. When these factors are present, it builds a strong level of
motivation which results in good job performance and absence of these factors
does not prove highly dissatisfying the job. These factors include: achievement,
recognition and the resistibility of personal growth
(Baah and Kofi Amoako, 2011).
Hygiene
Factors
Hygiene factors also referred as the
maintenance factors and contain of the physiological, safety and love needs
from Maslow’s hierarchy of needs (Baah and Kofi Amoako, 2011). Employee dissatisfaction from hygiene issues at
work is preventable and these factors are reducing the level of job
dissatisfaction correlated to them (Alshmemri, Shahwan and Maude, 2017). Lucas (1985) discovered that the
“supervisor –employee relationship” was a significant factor influencing worker
satisfaction in a study of U.S. These
factors include company policy and administration, technical supervision,
interpersonal relations with supervisor, salary, job security, personal life,
work conditions and status. However these factors are not direct motivators but
it’s necessary to prevent dissatisfaction
(Baah and Kofi Amoako, 2011).
Figure 5: Hygiene and Motivation factor combination
Source : (Baah and Kofi Amoako, 2011).
§
High hygiene + high motivation, the ideal
situation where employees are highly motivated and have few complaints.
§ High hygiene + low motivation: Employees have
few complaints but are not highly motivated.The job is then perceived as a pay
check.
§
Low hygiene + high motivation: employees are
motivated but have a lot of complaints. A
situation where the job is exciting
and challenging but salaries and work conditions are not.
§
Low hygiene + low motivation: the worse
situation unmotivated employees with lots of complaints.
Herzberg tried to separate motivational and
hygiene factors into two categories affecting separate aspects of job satisfaction.
This thought differed from the traditional approach of viewing job satisfaction
and dissatisfaction as opposite ends with the same continuity (Herzberg 1966).
According
to Herzberg (1987), managers need to eliminate the dissatisfaction by under
mentioned points:
Ø
Fix poor and unhealthy company policies – Bank
is accepting employee views and welcome suggestions made by staff
Ø
Provide effective and supportive supervision –
Supportive superiors enhancing the smoothness of operations in Bank
Ø
Create and support the culture of respect for
team members – Organizing team buildup training programs for all categories of
staff
Ø
Competitive salaries – Based on the Banking
sector salaries, the bank where I am employed, provides a competitive salary
with fringe benefits
Ø
Give a Job security – Employees have formed
trade unions which would address the issues related to the job security
Ø
Meaningful work for all positions by building
a job status – All employees of the bank are qualified and fit for their job
roles and Bank provides adequate training facilities to keep the staff updated
on all new initiatives.
The above
points help to eliminate job dissatisfaction in the organization and these
issues won’t come up until employee address. Managers should be aware that just
because of someone is not dissatisfied means one is motivated
(Baah and Kofi Amoako, 2011).
Herzberg
(1987) talks about job enrichment which is to address the motivating factors
associated with work. His thought was every job should be more examined to how
it could be made better and satisfy the person doing it. Thus managers need to
pay attention.
- Provide opportunities for achievement - Valuing suggestions from staff members
- Recognize workers contribution – Awarding best branch and best employee the year
- Providing opportunities for internal promotions – Junior executives & Senior executives in the bank are internally promoted to higher positions
- Offering training and development opportunities, so employees can follow the positions they – Employees who have special skills in specialized areas get the opportunity for promotions in the respective categories (Baah and Kofi Amoako, 2011).
Reference
Alshmemri, M., Shahwan,
L. and Maude, P., 2017. Herzberg’s Two-Factor Theory. Life Science
Journal 2017, [online] 14(5). Available at: <http://www.lifesciencesite.com>.
Baah, K., 2011.
Application of Frederick Herzberg’s Two-Factor theory in assessing and
understanding employee motivation at work: a Ghanaian Perspective. European
Journal of Business and Management, 03(09).
Stello, C. M. (2011). Herzberg’s
two-factor theory of job satisfaction: An integrative literature review. Journal
of Education and Human Development, 1-32.
Herzberg, F., Mausner, B., &
Snydermann B. (1959). The motivation to work. New York: Wiley.
Ruthankoon, R., & Ogunlana, S.
O. (2003). Testing Herzberg’s two-factor theory in the Thai construction
industry. Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management, 10(5)
Lucas, G. H. (1985). The
relationship between job attitudes, personal characteristics, and job outcomes:
a study of retail store managers. Journal of Retailing, 61(1),
35–62.
Herzberg, F. (1966). Work and
the nature of man. Cleveland, OH: World Publishing Company.

I had good learning in this post. Hygiene factors are not directly related to the job but the conditions that surround doing the job. Anyhow, the presence of such conditions does not necessarily build strong motivation (Gibson 2000).
ReplyDeleteThank you Loshitha. In addition to what you noted, (Kanfer, 1990) stated, that the goals can be achieved only if the motivated employees is working as the same direction as the organization is moving and it wanted to . If not the motivation can only be considered as a useless form of energy.
ReplyDelete