Skip to main content

EMPLOYEE ENGAGEMENT IN AN ORGANISATION




Employee engagement is a business management concept. Critical links between employee engagement, customer loyalty, business Growth and profitability were identified by the Gallup Corporation in 2004. Businesses are attempting to improve quality and customer service without increasing costs. Therefore, Businesses embrace this concept to achieve more with less. Businesses would lead their fellow competitors when employing engaged work force (Carnahan, 2013).

According to Truss et al (2013: 1): ‘The notion that individuals can be “personally” engaged in their work, investing positive emotional and cognitive energy into their role performance, was first proposed by William Kahn (1990) in his seminal article in the Academy of Management Journal’. Schaufeli (2013: 15) commented: ‘It is not entirely clear when the term “engagement” was first used in relation to work, but generally the Gallup Organization is credited with coining the term, sometime during the 1990s’.Schaufeli and Bakker (2004) defined engagement as a state of mind relating to positive, fulfilling work that is characterized by three key elements; vigordedication and absorption.

Vigor is the willingness of the employees to do the “hard” work, having the determination and the willingness to put in the time & effort that is needed to get the difficult work done.


Dedication is the presence of significance, enthusiasm, inspiration, pride, and challenge in the employees.

Absorption how concentrated and “happily” occupied the employees are with their work, to the level where detaching from work becomes a challenge. This is the state commonly referred to as being on a “flow”, where the mind is laser focused on the job at hand & the body executes flawlessly.

Employee satisfaction, regardless of having some similarities with employee engagement, should not be considered the same as employee engagement. Engagement is much more than mere satisfaction. For example a person who is satisfied with their job could be a totally disengaged employee. Steve Jobs said “the only way to do great work is to love what you do” (Stanford University, 2005).

Employee engagement does not mean Employee happiness. And it does not mean employee satisfaction. Employee engagement is the emotional commitment the employee has, to the organization and its goals. This means engaged employees give discretionary effort or they are willing to go the extra mile

(Kruse, 2012).

Figure 1: Key Factors that drive Employee Engagement and the Key Outcomes for the Individual (Employee) & the Organization 

(7 Ways to Improve Employee Development Programs, 2015).

Figure 1 depicts the key factors that trigger employee engagement (the input) and the key outcomes that the individual (employee) and the organization (employer) can expect (the output). It is evident that Job Satisfaction is only one of the factors that stimulate employee engagement. The thirteen factors listed on Figure 1 makes it clear that creating employee engagement is not an overnight process and the organization must infuse the concept in to its culture as well as to other policies and procedures. The outcomes of employee engagement will be discussed in detail on a forthcoming post.


The Bank I work for engaging in many financial and non-financial activities to motivate the banking employees.  Financial rewards such as paying a good bonus to appreciate the hard work throughout the year. Not only financial rewards Non Financial activities are a free tool that the bank is using to motivate the banking employees. Such as, when a job is done, the senior manager uses to appreciate the great job in the middle of the staff meeting. And the bank is conducting compulsory staff training programs for each and every employee. Also bank is promoting their employees who are engaged with their carrier.  



Reference

Carnahan, D., 2013. A Study Of Employee Engagement, Job Satisfaction And Employee Retention Of Michigan Crnas. [online] Deepblue.lib.umich.edu. Available at: <https://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/handle/2027.42/143415?show=full>.

Kahn, W A (1990) Psychological conditions of personal engagement and disengagement at work,Academy of Management Journal, 33 (4),pp 692–724

Schaufeli, W B (2013) What is engagement? in (eds) C Truss, R Deldridge, K Alfes, A Shantz and E Soane, Employee Engagement in Theory and Practice, London, Routledge, pp 15–35

Schaufeli, W. B. and Bakker, A. B. (2004) Job demands, job resources, and their relationship with burnout and engagement: a multi-sample study. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 25(1), pp. 293-315.

Stanford University (2005) 'You've got to find what you love,' Jobs says. [Online]. Available at: https://news.stanford.edu/2005/06/14/jobs-061505/ .

Harvard Business Review. n.d. 7 Ways To Improve Employee Development Programs. [online] Available at: <https://hbr.org/2015/07/7-ways-to-improve-employee-development-programs> .

https://www.researchgate.net/. 2017. Employee Engagement Factor For Organizational Excellence. [online] Available at: <https://www.researchgate.net/figure/Characteristics-of-an-engaged-employee_fig1_316692002>.

Kruse, K., 2012. Employee Engagement 2.0. The Kruse Group.














Comments

  1. Agreed with your views. Macey and Schneider (2008), suggested to regard employee engagement as a wide-ranging term which contains different types of engagement (traits engagement, psychological state engagement, behavioral engagement), and each one needs different conceptualizations, such as proactive personality (traits engagement), involvement (psychological state engagement) and organizational citizenship behavior (behavioral engagement).

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Thank you for the comment Uditha. Beside Motivation refers to an internally generated drive to achieve a goal or follow a particular course of action.Also highly motivated employees focus their efforts on achieving specific goals Skripak (2016).

      Delete
  2. Agree with your views. Employee engagement is a workplace approach resulting in the right conditions for all members of an organization to give of their best each day, committed to their organizations goals and motivated to contribute to organizational success with a higher sense of their own well-being. Employee engagement directly impact to performance of the organization & it has a positive relationship between employee engagement & performance (Solomon Markos & M. Sandhya Sridevi , 2010).

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Thank you for your insight Madu. (Naylor et al,1980) says the sensitivity and the external validity of an organisational internal setting and how it affects the level of motivation in an employee. Further on his study he proves that the amount of time of effective engagement for a particular job is a good indicator of an motivated employee.

      Delete
  3. Agreed with you ,The high levels of employee engagement may lead to improved employee commitment & involvement in direction of respective jobs and creating a motivated workforce also, they will work together to achieve the common goals of the organization (DK Mehta & NK Mehta,2013).

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Thank you Jinesh. Further more Pinder ( 2008), stated that the motivation can be explained as the method which reflects employees' persistence ,direction and intensity and therefore motivated employees deliver the maximum commitment to work.

      Delete
  4. Agreed and indeed. Employee engagement as the employee's effective involvement in work and the state of complete physiology, cognition and emotion that goes with the work engagement including three dimensions: work engagement, organizational recognition and sense of work value (Sun, 2018).

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Thank you for your comment. It is the responsibility of the leadership to use an intrinsically motivated employee for the benefit of the organisation. Setting up realistic and achievable goals make it easier for the employees to pursue success within the organisation (Cummins and Staw, 1993).

      Delete
  5. Agree with you gayan. Adding further, Every organization expects the best performance from their employees. It remains their behavior to select the best candidates suiting the roles and train them to carry out their jobs.Block & Pickl (2014) state that despite developing various HR policies, measures, and numerous studies carried out, it has not been possible to establish exact reasons behind human be-behavior. The term ‘employee engagement’ has gained a lot of importance in the recent past, as it has been proved that there is connection between engagement and business results(Ganguli, Gupta & Ponnam, 2015; Kular et al., 2008; Markos &Sandhya, 2010; Prabhakar & Ram, 2011).

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Thank you for the comment Dilusha. According to (Isaac, Zerbe and Pitt, 2001) The role of the leadership is the most influential factor when motivating an employee. The decisions, attitudes and strategies of the leadership can entirely change the level and amount of motivation within an organization.

      Delete
  6. Agreed Gayan. Company productivity is based on employees and their performances. To the Effective and productive organization, employee engagement is more important to all of organizations. To pursuing organization process properly and effectively get engaged people are more significant to management(Truss et al 2013).

    ReplyDelete
  7. Agree with your views. Further, Albdour and Altarawneh (2014) describe, that the promotion of participative work behaviors is essential, by creating a friendly nature in the work environment, which will enable employees to be enthusiastic, willing, passionate and committed in the work and in achieving the organizational goals.

    ReplyDelete
  8. Agreed with your view, further employee engagement is what employees willing to give and involve for the organization’s success as engaged employee produce more and link with organization’s success (Bukker, 2011).in addition to this engaged employees expressed affectively, cognitively and physically for organizations success hence employee engagement is most crucial part in any organizations (Byrne, 2015).

    ReplyDelete

  9. I agree with your views. The concept of employee engagement represents the extent of employee involvement, passion to perform the relevant task, enthusiasm and energy of the workforce (Eldor and Vigoda-Gadot, 2016). Further, Macey et al. (2009: 4) define employee engagement as “employees feeling so engaged and energized that they give extra time and resources without management asking”.

    ReplyDelete
  10. Agree with your views. Organizations important to offer a mentally safe workplace towards expand employee engagement. Employees who are engaged in their work and committed to their organizations give companies crucial competitive advantages including higher productivity and lower employee turnover (Kompaso & Sridevi, 2010; Vance, 2006).

    ReplyDelete
  11. Organizations with proper employee engagement strategies can increase the employee effectiveness and productivity level while reducing the staff turnover rate (Robertson-Smith & Markwick, 2009).

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Criticisms of Ibrahim Maslow’s theory of Motivation Maslow’s hierarchy of needs theory is a psychological theory introduced by Ibrahim Maslow in 1943. As a humanistic psychologist, Ibrahim Maslow introduced and published Motivation and Personality, which clarified how people satisfy their needs from their work-life (Joseph E and Gawel, 1996) . In his theory, Maslow said that people have five types of needs that are activated hierarchically, such that the lowest- order need must be fulfilled before the next order need is triggered and this processed continues (Kaur, 2013) . This theory was considered to be the first and foremost content theory of motivation which was developed in 1953. In this theory, individuals move in a unique order based on physiological and physiological needs Maslow (1987). He believed that every person has a strong want to reach a level of ‘self- actualization’ and that change the model of the development whose main point was to emphasize the positive pote...
  Training and Development Introduction Training and Development is the process of investing in people, and then they are equipped to perform well. This is a part of Human Resources Management where every organization has to face to motivate their employees. However, the amount, quality and quantity of training carried out by organization is differing from other organizations. Organizations have to train their employees very well (The Impact of Training and Development on Employee Performance, 2018) . Training and Development As Reynolds (2005) pointed out, training has a support to increase learning: ‘It should be reserved for situations that justify amore directed, expert-led approach rather than viewing it as a comprehensive and all-pervasive people development solution.’ According to Armstrong (2000), “Training is systematic development of knowledge, skills and attitudes required by an individual to perform adequately a given task or job”. Organ...